Really, Gina Kolata?

I normally enjoy Gina Kolata‘s writing, and I like her Personal Best column in the New York Times quite a bit. But this just strikes me as ridiculous:

That means it is a disadvantage to eat most of the day’s calories at one time — at night, for example. But athletes should make dietary changes gradually so their bodies can adapt to more frequent fueling, he said. Those who try sudden changes sometimes pay a price.

Dr. Benardot tells the story of a distance runner who was doing well and felt great the morning of a big marathon. Before the race began, she saw her chief competitor put packs of a sugary gel into her running bra to eat during the race.

The distance runner did the same, even though she had never before eaten during races or long runs. It was a disaster: She had diarrhea during the event.

The gels “were anything but a competitive advantage,” Dr. Benardot said.

Vanilla bean flavored GU energy gel.

Image via Wikipedia

This is excerpted from a post Kolata recently wrote for the Times’s Well blog on how much people eat while running or participating in any kind of endurance training. The way she describes things, you’d think a marathon (or even a long run) was just a trip down one long buffet table: an endless (and long) graze! I run with a lot of people, and I see a lot of people while I’m running. I have never once seen (or heard about) people eating this much during a training run or a race. Maybe I’m just surrounded by the wrong people?

To focus just on this excerpt, though, I feel compelled to channel Amy Poehler and counter with a “really? Really?!” I just don’t believe that this story is true. Sure, a lot of runners make the mistake of trying something new on race day with disastrous results. But a successful distance runner who is confident about her performance and has a “chief competitor”? I’m sorry, but a runner in that position is going to know better than to do something like that on the morning of a race just because the competition is doing it too. That has got to be as apocryphal as the story about the guy who gouged his eyes out with bottle caps while going through a bad acid trip (as much as I’ve always wanted that story to be true. You know, just because).

I mean, look. You think people are eating too much while running. You have some weird hang-up about it or whatever. Fine. Just don’t start printing made-up stories to validate your opinion. You’re better than that, Gina.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Race Report: PPTC Cherry Tree 10-miler

Yesterday I ran the Prospect Park Track Club Cherry Tree 10-miler with Tracy and Tara. Actually, it might be more accurate to say I ran the race thanks to them. If they hadn’t been there to keep me going every step of the way, I would have given up before I’d even started.

For no real reason, I put off registering until online registration had closed and the only options left were in-person registration in Brooklyn during the days leading up to the race, or on-site registration the morning of the race. Since I didn’t really want to travel all the way out to Brooklyn just to sign a paper and pay for a race, I figured I’d do it morning of, in spite of the fact that it was pretty expensive (the race registration fee started at $20, but ended up at $40. Not expensive for a 10-miler, unless you know you could have paid $20 if you’d been more on top of things). I emailed the race organizers the night before the race just to make sure there was still space available (again with the going all the way out to Brooklyn) and got a less-than-optimistic-response: “Get here at 8 [when registration opens] and you’re sure to get a spot.” I wasn’t supposed to meet Tracy in Manhattan until 8, and I began to wonder if I’d be wasting my time getting there at 9:15 or so. Would I miss my window of opportunity and end up without a bib?

Tracy convinced me to come and see what would happen, and the three of us headed out to Prospect Park. I stopped off at the registration site, which was located about half a mile from the starting line in the cafeteria of a high school. It’s nice when races have an indoor space where people can hang out before the event starts, and not have to freeze in the cold. But I’m glad we didn’t end up waiting there. For one thing, it smelled like an outhouse. For another, it was complete chaos. While standing in line to hand in my registration form, I had a kid crash into my legs. I guess when you’re a parent standing around chatting with other runners, it’s hard to keep tabs on what your child is doing. On top of all that, it was really unclear where anything was. There were tables with volunteers, but no indication of their function. Individual registration? Relay registration? Packet pick-up? As far as I could tell, there were no signs. I asked someone where I could register, and he pointed vaguely toward a grouping of tables with a lot of stuff on them, but no volunteers in sight. I found some registration forms on one of the tables, and filled it out. By that time, a volunteer had appeared at a neighboring table, so I took my form to him. At that point I found out that the registration fee could only be paid with cash or a check. There’d been no indication of this anywhere on the website, and there was no indication of it at the registration table–I’d only brought my check card with me. I was so frustrated by that point that I really just wanted to go home. But Tracy and Tara both had cash with them, making it possible for me to return to the stinky high school, pay my fee, get my bib, and get the hell out of there. I was offered a fleece hat souvenir, but I’d seen them on other people and decided to pass. The last thing I need sitting around my apartment is a fleece had that is big enough to fit my head in it twice.

Fortunately once I got the registration debacle out of the way, things were pretty smooth. The three of us went into the race knowing we didn’t really want to race, we just wanted to run. We took it pretty easy and ended up coming in under 1:40, which, it turned out, was the super secret goal both Tracy and I were shooting for. Considering that my time was around 1:47 last time I ran a 10-miler, I was really happy to run a 1:38 without feeling like I was killing myself! We’d been on pace to hit our super secret goal during the entire run, but we were helped a bit by a woman who was consistently running or walking around where we were–she’d be walking, and then as soon as we’d run past her, she’d start running, pass us, and continue running until she had a bit of a lead, at which point she’d go back to running. I’ve always hated when people do that, I find it really annoying! So during our final loop of the park, we decided we wouldn’t let her pass us anymore. As we approached the last .3 mile, she overtook us. But, stubborn as I am, I sped up (since we weren’t racing, I had plenty of effort left in my tank) and left her behind. Tracy and Tara did the same. Mature? No. Spiteful? Yes. Satisfying? Also yes. Normally, I try not to let that sort of thing get to me, but there was something about that woman!

All in all, the run was really enjoyable. I’m still a little annoyed about my overall experience with the race organization, though. In addition to the on-site registration chaos (and the lame souvenir), there was very little water available on the course. Two stations were set up, and they were positioned well (since this was a loop course, two stations were enough), but the water was poured into tiny Dixie cups. It would have been a great supplement if I’d had a Fuel Belt or a hand-held bottle with me, but I didn’t because I assumed there would be enough water for me to get by without them. There also weren’t that many cups, and I didn’t want to stop running in order to stand at the table and drink five tiny cups of water before continuing on my way. At the end of the race, there was a single table with more Dixie cups of water, and a few with Gatorade. The volunteers were doing their best to provide water to all the finishers, but there was far more demand than there was supply. And because the race home base was at the high school, there was *nothing* to eat at the finish. Not even orange slices or something tiny. Nothing at all. This was another case where, had I known there wouldn’t be anything, I would have made sure to bring a Luna bar or something. But when you run a ten-mile race, you just sort of assume that there will be something at the finish, and that you won’t have to walk half a mile before you can get to it. Finally, there were no clocks on the course at all. Since I wasn’t paying all that much attention to time, that was fine with me. But I wasn’t the only person out there, and I’m sure there were a lot of runners who would have liked to know how they were doing from mile to mile. If they weren’t keeping track of their splits on their own watches, they would have had no way of getting that information.

This was a fun race–the spectators were enthusiastic, and Prospect Park is a beautiful place to run (and one I’m not as used to as Central Park, which makes it all the more interesting). But I kind of feel like the things about it that went well were incidental to the organizers of the race. I would definitely do this race again, but I hope that next year things will be done a bit better.

Enhanced by Zemanta

What Kind of Month is February?

Why, it’s a Health Month!

Generally, I find February the most depressing and drawn-out month of the year, which is always strange to me given that it’s actually the shortest month of them all. If it’s so short, why does it feel like lasts forever? Why doesn’t it just fly by?

This February, I’m trying to turn things around a bit and not get caught up in my usual slump. To do this, I’m making a concerted effort to stay positive (vague!), run regularly (slightly less vague!), and chart my progress toward specific goals through this website/online game called Health Month. I started playing around with the site toward the end of last month, and decided I would play with it some more this month, in order to get the full effect.

Image via Health Month

Here’s how it works. At the beginning of the month, you choose a series of rules, and set parameters for yourself. The rules you choose can be selected from pre-entered ones, or customized to suit your goals. You get to determine how often you do/don’t do something, and what kind of reward or punishment will be meted out at the end of the month. To the left, I’ve provided a screen cap of the rules I set for myself.

Once you’ve chosen your rules, you’re ready to play. You can set things up so that the site sends you a reminder to check in (or “play your turn”) once a day, and there are different metrics you can use to track your weight, body fat percentage, energy level, mood, and stress level. You can provide as much or as little information as you want.

The game is meant to have a social aspect to it, but so far I haven’t really interacted with anyone, which is fine with me. I think (although I’m not sure) that it’s currently in beta, but I was able to sign up without having to request an account, so I’m not sure that access is limited in any way.

Admittedly, I haven’t been a user of Health Month for a very long period of time. But that hasn’t stopped me from formulating an opinion on it, naturally! As far as I’m concerned, there are things about it that are positive, and there are things about it that are less positive. Here’s my assessment (and I should point out that a) these opinions are entirely my own and b) I wasn’t asked by anyone from Health Month to post about it, mention it, or even use it. I just thought it  might be kind of interesting to check out):

Pro:

  • A lot of options to customize. You really can select a variety of things to focus on, and there’s a lot of freedom when it comes to determining how important your goals are, how hard they will be to accomplish, etc.
  • Playing can add an element of fun or interest to goals that might be hard for you to achieve otherwise. When you fail to meet your goals, you lose points. No one likes to lose points, even if the points have no value outside of the game. I lost one recently and I feel really guilty and kind of ashamed of myself.
  • The social aspect of the game potentially puts you in touch with others who are looking to accomplish similar things.
  • The site analyzes the information you put in and tracks progress for you in a variety of ways. I always find it fun and interesting to track my own progress in different areas, and I like the fact that I don’t have to generate summaries and analyses myself.

Con:

  • A general lack of information when it comes to many aspects of the game. For instance, you can set up to three rules for free. If you want to add more rules on top of those, you have to pay. I’m sure that’s fine for some people (depending, of course, on how much you value your rules), but the site doesn’t make it very clear.
  • A few things seem kind of buggy. I set up a profile, and to the best of my knowledge, I completed it. But the site is still prompting me to complete my profile.
  • Support doesn’t seem great. I sent in an email about a few problems I was having early on (ie back in January) and never heard back. This struck me as strange because there are a lot of places on the site where users are encouraged to submit feedback and interact with the Health Month team (which, as far as I can tell, consists principally of one person).
  • I really had to work out for myself how things were supposed to be done. There are guidelines, but their location wasn’t immediately obvious, and I didn’t get a sense that there was anything equivalent to a quick setup resource. Everything I know about Health Month, I figured out on my own. For that reason, everything I’ve said in this post could be 100% wrong.

Basically, the concept is a good once, but the execution still has a few kinks that need to be worked out. I think a bit more transparency when it comes to policies, procedures, and user guidelines could really help make this into a fun, enjoyable way for people to work toward achieving something. I definitely prefer it to Social Workout which, in spite of its potential, just doesn’t really go anywhere if you ask me. And because sites like these are becoming more and more common, they really need to set themselves apart in order to avoid fading into obscurity or never getting off the ground.

How Much Would You Pay?

It’s been a while since I bought a new pair of running tights, and as a result I’m on the market for a couple new pairs. Of course, running tights tend to be on the pricy side, and I am, as usual, a little bit strapped for cash (I’m also debating whether I should buy new full-length tights or a few more pairs of capris given how mild this winter has been, but that could be another post altogether). Because of my financial situation–and, let’s be honest, my refusal to pay much for running clothes in general–I’ve been shopping around a bit, and hitting up the usual suspects for a good deal.

I’ve got to say, when you start looking around for a specific item, you start to find some wacky stuff. Obviously it’s no surprise that there are items out there that are either strange and overpriced (this comes to mind), or strange, overpriced, and hideous (I’m looking in your direction again, lululemon. I mean really, jodhpurs? Now you’re just openly mocking us. Except joke’s on you because the word is not spelled johdpur). Apparel like that has been around for ages, and if you don’t believe me just watch any runway show ever.

Image via RoadRunnerSports.com

I think, though, that I may have come across an item that takes the cake. Now, I mean no disrespect to CW-X, but unless these tights are going to wash and fold themselves and do the rest of my laundry while they’re at it, I really just can’t justify paying close to $200 for them. The product description is trying to make me think that wearing them will give me flat abs and toned muscles, but frankly I don’t really go in for that snake oil sort of thing. Personally, I’d rather pay $150 less and just do some crunches. Or maybe Pilates.

I own a pair of CW-X tights, and I admit that I a) paid a pretty penny for them and b) like them a lot. But I got them about two years ago, and they’re showing more signs of wear (example: the inner thigh seam is beginning to split) than pairs I’ve had for much longer. I also used to have a pair of CW-X capris, and got rid of them after about a year and a half because of the same problem. When I spoke with a representative from the company last year at the running show I went to, he said this was pretty normal and that it was to be expected. He also suggested that I stitch up the seams myself, or that I just buy a new pair. That’s when I decided that in the future, I’d stick to a more reasonable budget when shopping for running tights (actually, I’d already made that decision when I got rid of the capris. Talking to the CW-X rep convinced me I’d made the right decision, though).

So I’m curious: would you pay $194.99 for the Revolution Tight? If not, what would it take (if anything) for you to justify the price?

Natural Beauty is the New ‘Look’ [Embrace:Me]

Well, score one for all of us who have been hoping that the unrealistic standards of beauty our society obsesses over would go the way of the buffalo. It turns out that natural beauty is the big new thing! Has a new day dawned? Are we witnessing the beginning of the end of feeling bad about our inability to look like supermodels? Can we finally breathe a collected sigh of relief, relax, and start feeling good about ourselves?

Um, no.

Come on. Did you think some kind of miracle had occurred?

Health (magazine)

Image via Wikipedia

According to an article from Health.com, ‘natural beauty’ is in. It sounds so promising. I want to be happy about it. But I’m also skeptical about the feel-good potential of any article that comes from a website where the top fitness stories are titled, ‘Moves for a Better Body’, ‘Burn Fat With Ballet’, and ’5-Minute Fat Burners’ (and let’s face it, that could be so many health and fitness websites targeted at women. It just so happens that those are the headlines from Health.com, but are they any different from the ones you’d find on Shape or Fitness?).

As it turns out, the kind of natural beauty that we’re all supposed to sport this season is just as contrived as any other beauty standard. Flaunt your freckles (but don’t forget to cover up other imperfections with powder)! Let your teeth be natural (but don’t forget to whiten them)! Don’t blow-dry your hair (but make sure it’s wavy)! No word on what we’re supposed to do if we don’t naturally have freckles, or our eyebrows are naturally thin, or our hair is pin-straight. I guess if that’s the boat we’re in, then we don’t get to hop on the natural beauty trend…because we’re not naturally beautiful. Maybe we could fake it by filling in our anemic eyebrows, drawing on some freckles, and having a friend knock our teeth crooked?

The thing about natural beauty is that it isn’t meant to be defined by any kind of parameter. Indeed, beauty isn’t meant to be defined by any kind of parameter. Often the things that are most beautiful are appealing and attractive for indescribable reasons. Unfortunately, once the media latches onto some idea about what beauty is, we all forget about the value of uniqueness and difference in beauty, and immediately start feeling pressure to conform to a standard that a team of marketers probably dreamt up in an office somewhere so that they could sell more lightweight bronzer and tinted moisturizer.

The media touting a new idea of beauty–one more “natural” than those from the recent past–is, sadly, no sign of change, and certainly no marker of a new era. Instead, it’s a campaign that’s just as insidious as the rest, an attempt to create a set of ideals against we measure ourselves, and can’t help but come up short. And to that, I say tchah. Let’s make 2012 the year we all stop caring about what other people define as beautiful, and find out what’s beautiful to us. What could be more natural than that?

Enhanced by Zemanta

Older posts «